Both business and technical leaders should use this impact analysis to surface the important issues of your Core System. The agency and the ISB Core Systems Sub Committee should discuss these issues at a high level as they review the project's business justification at Decision Point two. These issues are used and analyzed in detail later when developing the feasibility study.
| Core System Issue |
No Impact |
Low Impact |
Medium Impact |
Significant Impact |
Not Applicable |
| Organizational |
| Internal I.T. Resources |
|
|
|
|
|
| Internal Business Resources |
|
|
|
|
|
| Staffing Availability |
|
|
|
|
|
| Having to backfill positions |
|
|
|
|
|
| Stakeholder's Input on Requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
| Staff knowledge of the Technical Requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
| Training Internal Agency Staff |
|
|
|
|
|
| Training Other External Stakeholders or Users |
|
|
|
|
|
| Communications Plan & Communicating |
|
|
|
|
|
| Contracts |
| EXISTING Maintenance Contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
| NEW Maintenance Contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
| EXISTING Development Contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
| NEW Development Contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
| EXISTING Consulting Contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
| NEW Consulting Contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
| External Related |
| Level of need for external / contracted I.T. resources |
|
|
|
|
|
| Level of need for NEW software (third party) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Integrate third party software |
|
|
|
|
|
| Technical |
| Existing software |
|
|
|
|
|
| Licensing Issues (Backup S/W) |
|
|
|
|
|
| EXISTING hardware |
|
|
|
|
|
| NEW hardware |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hardware and software scalability |
|
|
|
|
|
| Impact to EXISTING Security |
|
|
|
|
|
| Modification of EXISTING network(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Existing Agency Architecture (data models, arch. Models etc.) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Existing Agency Infrastructure (overall H/W, networks, etc.) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Support level for NEW requirement(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Developing NEW User Interface components |
|
|
|
|
|
| Modifying EXISTING User Interface components |
|
|
|
|
|
| Developing NEW Business Process Conversion & Business Process change |
|
|
|
|
|
| Modifying EXISTING Business Process Conversion & Business Process change |
|
|
|
|
|
| Developing NEW user publications and help screens |
|
|
|
|
|
| Developing NEW source code |
|
|
|
|
|
| Modifying EXISTING source code |
|
|
|
|
|
| Growth of code complexity |
|
|
|
|
|
| Developing and evaluating a prototype. (Or, other user input required to verify the proposed change.) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Develop NEW reports |
|
|
|
|
|
| Modify EXISTING reports |
|
|
|
|
|
| Develop NEW database elements |
|
|
|
|
|
| Modify EXISTING database elements |
|
|
|
|
|
| Extent of Data Conversion |
|
|
|
|
|
| Degree of rework following reviews and testing |
|
|
|
|
|
| Impact of running parallel operations before cutover |
|
|
|
|
|
| Financial |
| Financial impact of Core System's change to customers / end-users |
|
|
|
|
|
| Financial challenge / impact of Core System's change to Agency |
|
|
|
|
|
| Project-Related |
| Impact on the agency's project management operations or project office |
|
|
|
|
|
| Level of need for or impact to multi-agency Steering Committee |
|
|
|
|
|
| Impact on agency's Quality Assurance Plan, software configuration management plan, or other plans |
|
|
|
|
|
| Cutover (System, Technical) efforts |
|
|
|
|
|
| Configuration Management (CM) efforts |
|
|
|
|
|
| Rollout Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
| Placing unacceptable demands on any computer resources required for the development, test, or host environments |
|
|
|
|
|
| Affect performance requirements or other quality attributes |
|
|
|
|
|
| Affect support for some of the existing services |
|
|
|
|
|